<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>More Mundane Meanderings &#187; Websites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.lot42.com/blog/category/websites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.lot42.com/blog</link>
	<description>Yet another rider on the blogging bandwagon.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:18:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Not another website!</title>
		<link>http://blog.lot42.com/blog/2007/01/08/not-another-website/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lot42.com/blog/2007/01/08/not-another-website/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 14:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Websites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lot42.com/blog/2007/01/08/not-another-website/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an attempt to see how easy it would be to rebrand the software for <a href="http://www.foodry.com">Foodry</a>, I sat down last night and set up <b>fish-stores.com</b>, <a href="http://www.fish-stores.com">a community directory of local fish stores</a>. The rebranding was fairly easy: just some text changes and whipping up a new logo. The big problem is the lack of data. For Foodry, I found <a href="http://chefmoz.org">Chef Moz</a>, an open source restaurant database. I&#8217;m fairly certain such a thing doesn&#8217;t exist for fish stores. Perhaps a niche community like home aquarists can support a dataset like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lot42.com/blog/2007/01/08/not-another-website/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Project</title>
		<link>http://blog.lot42.com/blog/2006/10/03/another-project/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lot42.com/blog/2006/10/03/another-project/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 05:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Websites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lot42.com/blog/2006/10/03/another-project/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Writing about my <a href="http://blog.lot42.com/archives/2006/09/what-google-giveth-google-can-taketh-away.html">last project</a> got me in the mood to put together something a bit more useful that what&#8217;s currently a bunch of Google ads. I was also looking for a good reason to do a little web 2.0 and AJAX programming, so I&#8217;ve used an hour here and there to put together [trumpet fanfare here] <a href="http://www.foodry.com">foodry</a>.</p>
<p>What is it? Well, not a lot at the moment, but it&#8217;s got a nice web 2.0-sounding name, doesn&#8217;t it? That&#8217;s what you get when you try to register a domain name an hour and a half after you should have gone to bed. Actually, as of this posting, it&#8217;s a mostly-empty database of its users&#8217; favorite restaurants.  A bit more work will allow the users to mark others as friends and see their reviewed restaurants and other social-networky type things like that. Also, there will be tags. There must be tags. This is web 2.0 we&#8217;re talking about here.</p>
<p>So, if you have a moment and the desire, sign up for an account and give it a little test spin. It&#8217;s not guaranteed to work. It&#8217;s probably guaranteed <i>not</i> to work in some places. If you find anything incredibly broken or ugly, send me an e-mail to <i>info at foodry dot com</i>.</p>
<p>Please note that there is no AJAX or other neat shiny things yet. Those will come, do not fear.</p>
<p>Also, Firefox 2.0 has neat spell checking built right in. I like that.</p>
<p><b>Update 10/04/06 11:38 PM:</b> We have tags!</p>
<p><b>Update 10/05/06 6:43 PM:</b> Tags work for real, now. I mean it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lot42.com/blog/2006/10/03/another-project/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Slashdot with CSS</title>
		<link>http://blog.lot42.com/blog/2005/09/21/slashdot-with-css/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lot42.com/blog/2005/09/21/slashdot-with-css/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 03:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Websites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lot42.com/blog/2005/09/21/slashdot-with-css/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like <a href="http://slashdot.org">Slashdot</a> is finally using CSS instead of tables for their layouts. I was in the middle of reading some article, when I got &#8220;503 Service Unavailable&#8221; whenever I clicked on their links. A few minutes later, I was able to access it again and the layout looked a bit different. Checking the source, the comments are all now enclosed in divs, with no tables to be found. I read they were beta testing it a couple months ago, but I never thought I see the day when Slashdot finally dropped their table layouts.</p>
<p><img alt="slashcode" src="http://blog.lot42.com/archives/slashdotcss.png" width="480" height="203"  border="1" align="center"/></p>
<p>I&#8217;m still getting intermittant 503 errors, so maybe they&#8217;re in the process of upgrading still. Or maybe they accidentally turned it on for a few minutes and are now rushing to turn it back off.</p>
<p>Technorati Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/slashdot" rel="tag">slashdot</a> <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/css" rel="tag">css</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lot42.com/blog/2005/09/21/slashdot-with-css/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amazon Shorts</title>
		<link>http://blog.lot42.com/blog/2005/08/23/amazon-shorts/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lot42.com/blog/2005/08/23/amazon-shorts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 04:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Websites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lot42.com/blog/2005/08/23/amazon-shorts/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was an interesting post on <a href="http://www.scalzi.com/whatever/003681.html">John Scalzi&#8217;s blog</a> yesterday about <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/browse/-/13993911/ref=sd_allcatpop_sh/103-4194976-6640667">Amazon Shorts</a>. Scalzi&#8217;s an author, so it was interesting seeing the commentary from that point of view, rather than as a developer or consumer:</p>
<blockquote><p>My feeling about Amazon Shorts is it&#8217;s best suited for writers who already have a significant and self-sustaining fan base. i.e., writers who are rather popular already. In the SF/F genre, I have no doubt whatsoever in my mind that if Neil Gaiman or Orson Scott Card or Connie Willis dropped something into Amazon Shorts, they would be likely to make a fair chunk of cash in short order. Some other writer whose name recognition is slightly less luminous &#8212; a comfortably mid-list writer, in other words &#8212; might not see a difference one way or another. But strictly in terms of the money, most writers (and I would include myself here) would probably be better off going to the venue where the money is offered up front, unless said author is ready, willing and able to flog the Amazon Short to all and sundry on a regular basis. If you&#8217;re not an inveterate self-promoter, this probably won&#8217;t be your bag.</p></blockquote>
<p>The comments in the blog post lead into a conversation about how the Amazon Shorts program, with some good editors on board to weed out the dreck, could lead into the direction of self-publishing. Maybe I should start working on a short story in case they open the program to any hack with a keyboard. Then I could make my 40% of $0.49 when my mom buys a copy.</p>
<p>Technorati Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/writing" rel="tag">writing</a> <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/amazon" rel="tag">amazon</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lot42.com/blog/2005/08/23/amazon-shorts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Garden Notes</title>
		<link>http://blog.lot42.com/blog/2005/01/20/garden-notes/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lot42.com/blog/2005/01/20/garden-notes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2005 03:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Websites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lot42.com/blog/2005/01/20/garden-notes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table align="left" style="margin: 5px">
<tr>
<td><a href="http://garden.lot42.com/monkey-puzzle-tree.php"><img border=0 src="http://garden.lot42.com/images/monkey-puzzle.jpg" alt="Monkey Puzzle Tree"></a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>It&#8217;s still a bit early to get excited about spring blooms, but I was just looking around on my web server and found an old site I started to put together about my garden. I called it <a href="http://garden.lot42.com/">Garden Notes</a> and it was going to be an attempt at providing semi-interesting articles about the various plants that were growing in my landscape. I didn&#8217;t get very far before I was sidetracked by work, but I have two articles up there. One&#8217;s about my <a href="http://garden.lot42.com/monkey-puzzle-tree.php">Monkey Puzzle Tree</a> and the other&#8217;s about the <a href="http://garden.lot42.com/hyacinth.php">Hyacinths</a> that were blooming last year. Hopefully I can find some time to add some more when things start growing again.</p>
<p>Update (8/6/05): I&#8217;ve moved Garden Notes to <a href="http://garden-notes.lot42.com">garden-notes.lot42.com</a> and am now running it as a blog using Movable Type. That should make updating a bit easier and may improve its performance in search engines, should I ever get inclined to write some more articles for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lot42.com/blog/2005/01/20/garden-notes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

